Ankara 19. Sulh Ceza Mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davaya, m\u00fcdahil Cengiz \u00d6zdiker ve avukat\u0131 Nadire \u00d6zkaya ile san\u0131k avukatlar\u0131 kat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n

Hakim Sait \u00c7a\u011flar, eski RT\u00dcK \u00fcyesi Ak Parti Konya Milletvekili \u0130lhan Yerlikaya ile ilgili evrak\u0131n ayr\u0131larak, ayr\u0131 bir esasa kaydedildi\u011fini bildirdi. Duru\u015fmada, taraflara esas hakk\u0131ndaki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fleri soruldu.<\/p>\n

M\u00fcdahil Cengiz \u00d6zdiker, g\u00f6reviyle ilgili yap\u0131lan atamalarda, 13 mahkeme ve Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savunarak, ma\u011fdur edildi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n eyleminin sabit oldu\u011funu iddia eden \u00d6zdiker, en \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131rdan ceza verilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zdiker’in avukat\u0131 Nadire \u00d6zkaya da yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131n san\u0131klarca uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek, san\u0131klardan \u015fikayet\u00e7i olduklar\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k Arif Merdol’un avukat\u0131 Erdal Merdol, m\u00fcvekkilinin, Cengiz \u00d6zdiker’in Adana B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcr yard\u0131mc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131na atanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara \u00e7ekimser, Adana B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ne atanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karara ise olumlu oy kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtti.<\/p>\n

Adana’n\u0131n g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir b\u00f6lge m\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc oldu\u011funu ifade eden Merdol, “M\u00fcvekkilimin su\u00e7 kast\u0131 yok. Sonras\u0131nda m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, E\u011fitim Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na atanmas\u0131 karar\u0131na da olumlu oy kullanm\u0131\u015f, Dan\u0131\u015ftayda bunun hukuka uygun bir atama oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015ftir” dedi.<\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkilinin, \u00d6zdiker’in, Ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve Geli\u015ftirme Dairesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na atanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik talebini destekledi\u011fini ve bu y\u00f6nde olumlu oy kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydeden Merdol, beraat talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n

Zahid Akman’\u0131n avukat\u0131
\nSan\u0131k Zahid Akman’\u0131n avukat\u0131 Hakan Y\u0131ld\u0131z da m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, onlarca mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n uygulanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrmesine ra\u011fmen m\u00fcvekkilinin, iddianamede 3 eylemden cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n istendi\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkilinin, su\u00e7lamalardan sorumlu tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade eden Y\u0131ld\u0131z, m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, Diyarbak\u0131r’a atanmas\u0131na, cumhuriyet savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca takipsizlik karar\u0131 verildi\u011fini, bununla ilgili tekrar yarg\u0131lama yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu.<\/p>\n

M\u00fc\u015ftekinin uzman denet\u00e7i olarak atanmas\u0131n\u0131n, hakk\u0131nda verilen disiplin cezas\u0131 nedeniyle oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren Y\u0131ld\u0131z, bu ataman\u0131n usul\u00fcne uygun oldu\u011funu ifade ederek beraat talebinde bulundu.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k Pa\u015fa Ya\u015far’\u0131n avukat\u0131 Salih Bekta\u015f da m\u00fcvekkilinin su\u00e7 kast\u0131 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, beraatine karar verilmesini istedi.<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar Taha Y\u00fccel ve Davut Dursun’un avukat\u0131 Veysi Sava\u015f da m\u00fc\u015ftekinin ilk g\u00f6rev de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011finin, san\u0131klardan \u00f6nceki heyet taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, m\u00fcvekkilinin de i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu heyetin de\u011fi\u015fik meslek gruplar\u0131ndan se\u00e7ildi\u011fini anlatt\u0131.<\/p>\n

M\u00fc\u015ftekinin g\u00f6revlendirildi\u011fi pozisyonlar\u0131n, RT\u00dcK mevzuat\u0131 ve imkanlar\u0131na g\u00f6re ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fini kaydeden Sava\u015f, “M\u00fcvekkilim hakk\u0131ndaki ithamlar as\u0131ls\u0131zd\u0131r. Su\u00e7un maddi ve manevi unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 beraatlerine karar verilsin” dedi.<\/p>\n

San\u0131k Abdulvahap Darendeli’nin avukat\u0131 Fatih Mehmet Erduran da m\u00fcvekkilinin hakimken, RT\u00dcK \u00fcyesi olarak atand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te birinci s\u0131n\u0131f hakim olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya devam etti\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.
\n“Dosyan\u0131n ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 talebi”<\/p>\n

M\u00fcvekkilinin, RT\u00dcK’teki g\u00f6revi sona erdikten sonra Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndaki g\u00f6revine geri d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc ifade eden Erduran, Darendeli’nin Hakimler ve Savc\u0131lar Kanunu’na tabi oldu\u011funu, bu nedenle de Yarg\u0131tayda yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini kaydetti.<\/p>\n

Darendeli’nin dosyas\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131larak izin i\u00e7in Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6nderilmesini talep eden Erduran, su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmeyerek, beraat talebinde bulundu.
\nMahkemenin karar\u0131<\/p>\n

Hakim Sait \u00c7a\u011flar, esas hakk\u0131ndaki savunmalar\u0131n tamamlanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan, karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

RT\u00dcK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Davut Dursun ve \u00fcye Taha Y\u00fccel ile eski RT\u00dcK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Zahid Akman ve eski \u00fcyeler Abdulvahap Darendeli, \u015eaban Sevin\u00e7, Pa\u015fa Ya\u015far hakk\u0131nda zincirleme olarak “g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma” su\u00e7undan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 1 y\u0131l 3 ay hapis cezas\u0131 veren mahkeme, takdiri indirim uygulayarak, san\u0131klar\u0131n cezas\u0131n\u0131 1 y\u0131l 15 g\u00fcne indirdi.<\/p>\n

Eski \u00fcye Arif Merdol’a “g\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma” su\u00e7undan 1 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 veren mahkeme, bu cezay\u0131, 8 aya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n

Merdol’un hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131, ba\u015fka yapt\u0131r\u0131mlara \u00e7evirmeyen mahkeme, “pi\u015fmanl\u0131k g\u00f6zlenmemesi, su\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f \u015fekli, su\u00e7 kast\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011funlu\u011fu, yeniden su\u00e7 i\u015flemeyecekleri y\u00f6n\u00fcnde olumlu kanaat olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131” gerek\u00e7esiyle, san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen cezalar\u0131 ertelemedi ve h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131 geri b\u0131rakmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar\u0131n, cezalar\u0131 tamamlan\u0131ncaya kadar belli haklardan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na h\u00fckmeden mahkeme, \u00d6zdiker’in 20 Nisan 2006’daki bir atamas\u0131yla ilgili d\u00f6nemin RT\u00dcK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Zahid Akman’\u0131n, kar\u015f\u0131 oyu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde 20 Nisan 2009’da Adulvahap Darendeli taraf\u0131ndan mahkeme dosyas\u0131na sunulan belgedeki yaz\u0131l\u0131 muhalefet \u015ferhinde imzas\u0131n\u0131n bulundu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle Akman hakk\u0131nda, “resmi evrakta sahtecilik” su\u00e7undan su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunulmas\u0131na karar verdi.
\nDavan\u0131n ge\u00e7mi\u015fi<\/p>\n

San\u0131klar, RT\u00dcK Uzman Denet\u00e7isi \u00d6zdiker’in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davalara ili\u015fkin, \u201cyarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131n\u0131 m\u00fckerreren uygulamad\u0131klar\u0131\u201d gerek\u00e7esiyle, \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak\u201d su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131land\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ankara 21. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi, TCK’n\u0131n \u201czincirleme su\u00e7\u201d ve \u201ctakdiri indirim nedenleri\u201dne ili\u015fkin maddelerini uygulayarak, “eylemlerinin a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve kas\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n yo\u011funlu\u011funa g\u00f6re\u201d Dursun, Akman ve Darendeli’yi, \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma\u201d su\u00e7undan, 2 y\u0131l 6’\u015far ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ayn\u0131 gerek\u00e7eyle Taha Y\u00fccel, \u0130lhan Yerlikaya, \u015eaban Sevin\u00e7 ve Pa\u015fa Ya\u015far’\u0131n 2 y\u0131l 9 ay 10’ar g\u00fcn, Arif Merdol’un 2 y\u0131l 2 ay 10 g\u00fcn hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 kararla\u015ft\u0131ran mahkeme, RT\u00dcK b\u00fcrokrat\u0131 5 san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise berat\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n

Temyiz ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Yarg\u0131tay 4. Ceza Dairesi san\u0131klar\u0131n mahkumiyet karar\u0131n\u0131 bozdu. Bozma ilam\u0131nda, 19 Aral\u0131k 2010’da, TCK’n\u0131n \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma\u201d su\u00e7unu d\u00fczenleyen 257. maddesinin 1. ve 2. f\u0131kralar\u0131ndaki \u201ckazan\u00e7\u201d s\u00f6zc\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn \u201cmenfaat\u201d olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirildi\u011fine ve f\u0131kralarda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen cezalar\u0131n indirildi\u011fine i\u015faret edildi.<\/p>\n

Yasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle, TCK’n\u0131n 257. maddesinin 1’inci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan \u201cbir y\u0131ldan \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131la kadar\u201d ibaresi \u201calt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar\u201d, 2’nci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan \u201calt\u0131 aydan iki y\u0131la kadar\u201d ibaresi \u201c\u00fc\u00e7 aydan bir y\u0131la kadar\u201d olarak de\u011fi\u015ftirilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Ankara 21. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi, \u201cg\u00f6revi k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanmak\u201d su\u00e7una ili\u015fkin cezan\u0131n \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n 2 y\u0131la indirilmesi nedeniyle g\u00f6revsizlik karar\u0131 vererek, dosyay\u0131 sulh ceza mahkemesine g\u00f6ndermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"