H\u00fcrriyet Gazetesi Yazar\u0131 \u0130smet Berkan, AK Parti \u0130ktidar\u0131’nda su\u00e7 oran\u0131n\u0131n ikiye katland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etti. \u00dclke n\u00fcfusunun 10 y\u0131lda y\u00fczde 10 artt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten Berkan, “Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131’n\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 da ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde nerdeyse iki kat, y\u00fczde 91.5 artt\u0131” dedi.<\/p>\n

“SU\u00c7 Y\u00dcZDE 41 ORANINDA ARTMI\u015e”
\n\u0130smet Berkan, sadece genel su\u00e7lara bakan Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131’n\u0131n \u00f6tesine \u00e7\u0131k\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, yani organize su\u00e7lar, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131, devlete kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar gibi \u00f6zel nitelikli su\u00e7lar\u0131 da grafi\u011fe ekleyince, AK Parti d\u00f6nemindeki su\u00e7 oran\u0131n\u0131n deh\u015fet vereci boyutlara ula\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu. AK Parti’nin iktidar\u0131 ile ge\u00e7en zaman\u0131 inceleyen Berkan, “\u0130\u015flenen su\u00e7lar, y\u00fczde 41 oran\u0131nda artm\u0131\u015f” dedi.<\/p>\n

\u0130SMET BERKAN’IN “SAVCILIKLARI”
\nBerkan’\u0131n ‘AK Parti ve su\u00e7’ temal\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131nda, su\u00e7 oranlar\u0131 kadar dikkat \u00e7eken \u00f6nemli bir detay da “Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z, savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z” sahiplenmesi olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. \u00d6zellikle y\u00fcr\u00fctme-yarg\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131n\u0131n zirve yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcnlerde \u0130smet Berkan, HSYK’n\u0131n yap\u0131s\u0131na y\u00f6nelik d\u00fczenlemelere kar\u015f\u0131 bir tav\u0131rla, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na ba\u011flanmas\u0131na tepki g\u00f6sterdi.<\/p>\n

18 Ocak 2014
\nAK Parti d\u00f6neminde su\u00e7 patlamas\u0131 m\u0131 ya\u015fand\u0131?<\/p>\n

\u00dcLKEM\u0130Z\u0130N n\u00fcfusu 2003 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 sonuna kadar kabaca y\u00fczde 10 kadar artm\u0131\u015f, 75 milyona gelmi\u015f.<\/p>\n

Buna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7 soru\u015fturmalar\u0131 ayn\u0131 d\u00f6nemde neredeyse iki kat, y\u00fczde 91.5 oran\u0131nda artm\u0131\u015f.
\nSadece genel su\u00e7lara bakan Cumhuriyet ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 de\u011fil bir de organize su\u00e7lar, ter\u00f6r su\u00e7lar\u0131, devlete kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar gibi \u00f6zel nitelikli su\u00e7lar\u0131 soru\u015fturmakla g\u00f6revli \u2018\u00f6zel nitelikli\u2019 savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131zda da 2003\u2019ten 2012\u2019ye varana kadar deh\u015fet bir yeni i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fc olu\u015fmu\u015f, a\u00e7\u0131lan soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 say\u0131s\u0131 y\u00fczde 41 oran\u0131nda artm\u0131\u015f.
\nBu istatisti\u011fe bak\u0131nca, 2003 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2012\u2019ye varana kadar \u00fclkede deh\u015fetengiz bir su\u00e7 patlamas\u0131 oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnebilirsiniz. Tamam\u0131nda AK Parti\u2019nin iktidarda oldu\u011fu bu y\u0131llarda savc\u0131l\u0131klardaki i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn artmas\u0131na ba\u015fka ne isim verilebilir, bilmiyorum.
\nVe yine, e\u011fer akl\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda ve makul bir insansan\u0131z, savc\u0131l\u0131klara soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 art\u0131\u015f\u0131 olarak yans\u0131yan bu su\u00e7 patlamas\u0131n\u0131n, mahkemelerimizin i\u015f y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fc de benzer oranlarda artt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 varsayabilirsiniz.
\nAma hay\u0131r. 2003 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00f6zel yetkili veya de\u011fil her \u00e7e\u015fit ceza mahkemesinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan dava say\u0131s\u0131 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda sadece y\u00fczde 12.8 oran\u0131nda artm\u0131\u015fsa, bu i\u015fte bir yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131k var demektir.<\/p>\n

\u00d6zel yetkili ya da de\u011fil, savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z ge\u00e7mi\u015fe g\u00f6re katbekat fazla say\u0131da vatanda\u015f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 \u00e7ok ama \u00e7ok uzun s\u00fcrelerle soru\u015fturuyor.
\nNe yap\u0131yor soru\u015ftururken?
\nTelefonlar\u0131n\u0131 dinliyor, gerekirse vatanda\u015f\u0131 fiziki takibe al\u0131yor, ili\u015fkilerini \u00f6\u011freniyor, ona g\u00f6re soru\u015fturmas\u0131n\u0131 geni\u015fletiyor; bazen soru\u015fturman\u0131n orta yerinde su\u00e7un niteli\u011fini de\u011fi\u015ftiriveriyor, ki\u015fileri g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131yor, sorguluyor, \u00e7o\u011fu zaman tutuklama istemiyle mahkemeye sevk ediyor, \u015f\u00fcphelileri daha ilk soru\u015fturma evresinde su\u00e7lu olarak duyuruyor, haklar\u0131ndaki bilgi ve belgeleri bas\u0131nla payla\u015fmakta sak\u0131nca g\u00f6rm\u00fcyor vs vs.
\nPeki sonunda ne oluyor? D\u00fcn de yazd\u0131m; soru\u015fturdu\u011fu 10 dosyadan 6\u2019s\u0131na dava bile a\u00e7m\u0131yor savc\u0131. O alt\u0131 dosyada soru\u015fturulan ki\u015filer ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131yla kal\u0131yorlar, yakay\u0131 s\u0131y\u0131rd\u0131klar\u0131, haks\u0131z yere hapis yatmaktan kurtulduklar\u0131 i\u00e7in neredeyse sevin\u00e7 i\u00e7inde evlerine d\u00f6n\u00fcyor, onlara uzun s\u00fcre hayat\u0131 zehir eden savc\u0131 aleyhinde bir i\u015flem yapmay\u0131 ak\u0131llar\u0131na bile getirmiyorlar.
\nYa savc\u0131n\u0131n nihayet dava a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 o 4 (asl\u0131nda 3.8) dosya ne oluyor? D\u00fcn rakamlar\u0131yla yazd\u0131m. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de a\u00e7\u0131lan ceza davalar\u0131n\u0131n sadece \u00fc\u00e7te biri (y\u00fczde 34) mahk\u00fbmiyetle sonu\u00e7lan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Bu rakamlar\u0131 bildi\u011finiz zaman, hi\u00e7bir savc\u0131n\u0131n y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc hi\u00e7bir soru\u015fturmaya kefil olamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131z\u0131 da biliyor oluyorsunuz. Yarg\u0131 sistemi her y\u0131l 15 milyon civar\u0131nda vatanda\u015f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n s\u0131rf ceza davalar\u0131 nedeniyle tezg\u00e2h\u0131ndan ge\u00e7ti\u011fi bir sistem. Bu sistemin g\u00fcvenilmezli\u011fi ve haks\u0131zl\u0131k yaratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 konusunda sokaktaki vatanda\u015f\u0131n en ufak bir ku\u015fkusu bile yok.
\nO y\u00fczden, vatanda\u015f\u0131 ter\u00f6rize etmenin, onu s\u00fcrekli endi\u015fe i\u00e7inde bekletmenin yeni ad\u0131, savc\u0131l\u0131k soru\u015fturmalar\u0131. Sonunda hi\u00e7bir \u015fey \u00e7\u0131kmayaca\u011f\u0131 biline biline veya s\u0131rf birilerine \u00e7amur atma imk\u00e2n\u0131 elde dursun diye soru\u015fturma dosyalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131yor olsa, b\u00f6ylesi bir \u2018su\u00e7 patlamas\u0131\u2019 da ya\u015fanmazd\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de.
\n\u2018Efendim su\u00e7 i\u015fleniyor ki soru\u015fturma a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yor, su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi olmasa neden a\u00e7\u0131ls\u0131n bu soru\u015fturmalar\u2019 laf\u0131 bo\u015f bir laf. Su\u00e7 i\u015flense, ger\u00e7ekten kuvvetli su\u00e7 \u015f\u00fcphesi olsa, savc\u0131lar dava a\u00e7ar, a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar\u0131 kazan\u0131r da. Zaten 10 dosyadan 6\u2019s\u0131na dava a\u00e7m\u0131yorlar. A\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 davalar\u0131n da \u00fc\u00e7te ikisini kaybediyorlarsa, burada fena halde \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fcm\u00fc\u015f bir \u015feyler var demektir.<\/p>\n

EL\u0130M\u0130ZDE 2012 y\u0131l\u0131 istatistikleri var. Buna g\u00f6re savc\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131m\u0131z 9 milyona yak\u0131n insan\u0131 soru\u015fturdu 2012\u2019de. Ayn\u0131 y\u0131l 7.5 milyona yak\u0131n insan\u0131n da yolu, \u2018ma\u011fdur\u2019 veya \u2018m\u00fc\u015fteki\u2019 s\u0131fat\u0131yla adliyelere d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.
\nBakt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131zda her y\u0131l rakamlar buna benzer gidiyor. Yani, \u2018Her fani adliyenin yolunu tutacakt\u0131r\u2019 s\u00f6z\u00fc hi\u00e7 de yanl\u0131\u015f bir s\u00f6z de\u011fil.
\nGenel anlamda yarg\u0131 sistemimiz iyi \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bir yandan \u015f\u00fcpheli s\u0131fat\u0131yla soru\u015fturdu\u011fu insanlar\u0131, bir yandan da ma\u011fdur veya m\u00fc\u015fteki olarak gelen ve u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 haks\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\/sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n hesab\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131n\u0131 isteyen insanlar\u0131 ma\u011fdur ediyor.
\nSoru\u015fturulanlar\u0131n y\u00fczde 62\u2019si bo\u015fa soru\u015fturuluyor; ma\u011fdur\/m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin \u00fc\u00e7te ikisi \u015fik\u00e2yetlerinden sonu\u00e7 alam\u0131yor.
\nVe bu i\u015f, mahkemelerden \u00f6nce savc\u0131l\u0131klarda d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcmleniyor.
\nE\u011fer savc\u0131lar\u0131m\u0131z, bo\u015fa y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fckleri ve bu yolla ma\u011fdur ettikleri ger\u00e7ek ki\u015filere hesap verebilir k\u0131l\u0131nsa, mesela do\u011frudan maddi manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131labilse onlara kar\u015f\u0131, sistem k\u0131sa zamanda kendine gelebilir.
\nMaddi\/manevi tazminat\u0131n sistemde kaosa yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnenler var. O zaman, belki devlet aleyhine dava a\u00e7ma yolu bug\u00fcn var olandan daha az dolamba\u00e7l\u0131, hatta do\u011frudan hale getirilerek do\u011facak tazminat\u0131n savc\u0131 veya h\u00e2kime r\u00fccu edilmesinin yolu a\u00e7\u0131labilir.
\nBunlar vatanda\u015f\u0131n i\u015fini kolayla\u015ft\u0131racak yeni hak arama yollar\u0131. Ama bir de genel olarak sistemin verimlilik sorununu \u00e7\u00f6zmek, yani meseleye tamamen y\u00f6netsel\/idari olarak yakla\u015fmak da m\u00fcmk\u00fcn. Bunun i\u00e7in de savc\u0131 ve h\u00e2kimlere mutlaka meslekte y\u00fckselme ve maa\u015f art\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00e7ok sert performans kriterleri getirmek laz\u0131m. A\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 hi\u00e7bir davay\u0131 kazanamayan bir savc\u0131n\u0131n hesap vermeden oturmas\u0131, \u00fcstelik de otomatik olarak maa\u015f art\u0131\u015f\u0131 almas\u0131 kabul edilebilir bir \u015fey de\u011fil.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"